Alexandre> Sounds reasonable to me. How about only enabling it when Alexandre> given the option --cache-file=<filename>? That is probably ok. As far as I know the "Cygnus" (now gcc, I guess) build environment always passes this option to subdir builds. Tom
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Martin Buchholz
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Tom Tromey
- config.cache considered harmful Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Alexandre Oliva
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Jamie Zawinski
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Alexandre Oliva
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Alexandre Oliva
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Tom Tromey
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Lars Hecking
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Alexandre Oliva
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille