>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alexandre> Like: Alexandre> How about ``remove config.cache and re-run configure'', as Alexandre> printed by AC_VALIDATE_CACHED_SYSTEM_TUPLE? Why doesn't it suggest distclean? Why isn't it used by default? (we would remove the AC_REQUIRE([AC_CANONICAL_SYSTEM])dnl, of course). >> I'm not proposing that the config.cache feature be removed, only >> that it not be made the _default_. Alexandre> Sounds reasonable to me. How about only enabling it when Alexandre> given the option --cache-file=<filename>? Fine with me. Akim
- autoconf is broken in various ways Martin Buchholz
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Tom Tromey
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Lars Hecking
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Martin Buchholz
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Tom Tromey
- config.cache considered harmful Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Alexandre Oliva
- Re: config.cache considered harm... Jamie Zawinski
- Re: config.cache considered harm... Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered ... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: config.cache considered harm... Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered ... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: config.cache considered ... Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harm... Tom Tromey
- Re: config.cache considered harm... Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered ... Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered ... Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered ... Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered ... Lars Hecking