On Feb 25, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alexandre> Like: Alexandre> How about ``remove config.cache and re-run configure'', as Alexandre> printed by AC_VALIDATE_CACHED_SYSTEM_TUPLE? > Why doesn't it suggest distclean? Because autoconf can't tell whether the maintainer created all standard Makefile rules. Removing config.cache is the only thing autoconf can ensure. But it could suggest distclean as a first attempt. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Enjoy Guaranį Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com Free Software Developer and Evangelist CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Write to mailing lists, not to me
- autoconf is broken in various ways Martin Buchholz
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Tom Tromey
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Lars Hecking
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Martin Buchholz
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Tom Tromey
- config.cache considered harmful Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Alexandre Oliva
- Re: config.cache considered harm... Jamie Zawinski
- Re: config.cache considered harm... Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered ... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: config.cache considered harm... Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered ... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: config.cache considered ... Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harm... Tom Tromey
- Re: config.cache considered harm... Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered ... Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered ... Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered ... Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered ... Lars Hecking
- Re: config.cache considered ... Akim Demaille