All, Why should entities get a break on a standard in existence and applied to all for years?
And why is tbe aggregate, in examples given, broken? ARIN already applies that to some applicants. No support. Support post exhaustion. Best, Martin > On May 2, 2014, at 20:52, Jimmy Hess <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 7:33 PM, John Santos <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Fri, 2 May 2014, Jimmy Hess wrote: >> >> I think 95% is too high, if the previous example of 3 /24's at 100% and >> 1 /24 at 75% is realistic. That works out to 93.75% aggregate utilization, >> not quite reaching the bar, so 90% might be a better threshold. > > For 3 /24s yes. The difficulty here, is trying to pick a single > utilization proportion that works regardless of the aggregate > allocation size, to allow for the loss of the oddball /26 or /27 that > can neither be returned nor reused, perhaps another method is in > order than presuming a single aggregate utilization criterion is > the most proper. > > > The more resources you are allocated, the more opportunity to make > your resource allocation efficient. By the time you get down to a > /26, an entire /24 is less than 0.4%. > > Aggregate Resources Allocated Required Aggregate > Utilization criterion > more than a /25 75% > more than a /22, 80% > more than a /20 85% > more than a /19 90% > more than a /18 95% > more than a /17 97% > more than a /16 98% > more than a /15 99% > > > >> >> OTOH, /24's are pretty small and maybe that example was just for >> illustration. If people really in this situation have much larger >> allocations, they would be easier to slice and dice and thus use (relatively) >> efficiently. 75% of a /24 leaves just 64 addresses (a /26) unused, which >> even if contiguous are hard to redeploy for some other use. 75% of a /16 >> would leave 16384 unused addresses, which could be utilized much more easily. >> >> >> Personally, I don't much care since my company has its /24, and that's >> probably all the IPv4 we'll ever need :-) >> >> >> -- >> John Santos >> Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc. >> 781-861-0670 ext 539 > > > > -- > -JH > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
