It would seem so. Jeff On May 3, 2014 10:38 AM, "Martin Hannigan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Friday, May 2, 2014, Jeffrey Lyon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Jeffrey, >> > >> > Let's be clear without political statements. I suggest we stamp all new >> v4 proposals "post exhaustion implementation" from here. Aside from the MAU >> reduction, I can't imagine anything else worthy of the effort. >> > >> > Agree or not? >> > >> > Best, >> > >> > -M< >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> On May 2, 2014, at 21:25, Jeffrey Lyon <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Yes it is. Are you expecting such a change to happen before or after? >> The >> >>> recent fury of v4 policy seems geared towards sooner. I think a >> moratorium >> >>> is in order except for transfer related policy at this juncture. >> >>> >> >> > [clip] > > >> >> >> Please forgive me if I am just confused or ignorant, but I agree we >> are now exhausted and whether a proposal is stamped post-exhaustion or >> otherwise, its implementation would have an immediate effect. >> >> What am I missing? >> >> > > So we agree then? > > >
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
