On Friday, May 2, 2014, Jeffrey Lyon <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Jeffrey, > > > > Let's be clear without political statements. I suggest we stamp all new > v4 proposals "post exhaustion implementation" from here. Aside from the MAU > reduction, I can't imagine anything else worthy of the effort. > > > > Agree or not? > > > > Best, > > > > -M< > > > > > > > > > > > >> On May 2, 2014, at 21:25, Jeffrey Lyon <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Yes it is. Are you expecting such a change to happen before or after? > The > >>> recent fury of v4 policy seems geared towards sooner. I think a > moratorium > >>> is in order except for transfer related policy at this juncture. > >>> > > [clip] > > > Please forgive me if I am just confused or ignorant, but I agree we > are now exhausted and whether a proposal is stamped post-exhaustion or > otherwise, its implementation would have an immediate effect. > > What am I missing? > > So we agree then?
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
