On behalf of myself, I support this proposal. On behalf of my company, which finds itself in the position of 8 large allocations above 93% and 1 small allocation below the 80% mark, I support this proposal.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Lyon Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 6:49 AM To: [email protected] List Subject: [arin-ppml] Policy discussion - Method of calculating utilization Friends, Colleagues, A couple of years ago I brought up an issue I had run into where the utilization requirement for new requests is being calculated on a per allocation basis rather than in aggregate. For example, if an organization has 4 x /22 and 3 of them are utilized 100% and the fourth utilized at 75%, that request would be denied. This is a bit out of balance as an organization with a single /20 utilized at 80% would have less efficient utilization but would be eligible to request additional space. The last time this was discussed it sounded as if the community would support a policy proposal to change this calculation to be considered in aggregate vs. per assignment. Does this remain the case? Thanks, -- Jeffrey A. Lyon, CISSP-ISSMP Fellow, Black Lotus Communications mobile: (757) 304-0668 | gtalk: [email protected] | skype: blacklotus.net _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
