On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:31 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 6/26/23 13:20, juan via agora-discussion wrote: > > Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-06-26 13:08]: > >> "Why should this be in the rules?" is a valid question. Putting > >> something in the rules means that everybody has to pay attention to it, > >> lest it change out from under them to actually do something, and that > >> people (like me) have rule-mandated obligations to track it. > >> > >> We have contracts for things that only people who are interested want to > >> pay attention to. > > That is not the point. Drafts are for gauging interest. And this draft > > clearly is demonstrating a mechanic, not a complete game. Judge it for > > what it's worth. > > > > If it turns out nobody likes it, I'll abandon it. The problem, for me, > > is the tone. > > > > Imagine showing someone a recipe for a nice and refreshing juice, to > > see what they think, and they responding “but this is not a complete > > meal. I'm hungry”. > > > > I've provided some more mechanical review from a quick glance. > > But you've presented this as a "proto" for a complete rule without any > suggestion of tying it into other things, and given that two other such > rules just passed while remaining untied to anything, I don't think > asking the question is unreasonable. > > -- > Janet Cobb > > Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason > > What do you mean the rules don't do anything? Clearly, they increase juan's voting strength B) -- 4ˢᵗ Deputy Herald and Deputy Prime Minister Uncertified Bad Idea Generator
