On 6/26/23 13:20, juan via agora-discussion wrote: > Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-06-26 13:08]: >> "Why should this be in the rules?" is a valid question. Putting >> something in the rules means that everybody has to pay attention to it, >> lest it change out from under them to actually do something, and that >> people (like me) have rule-mandated obligations to track it. >> >> We have contracts for things that only people who are interested want to >> pay attention to. > That is not the point. Drafts are for gauging interest. And this draft > clearly is demonstrating a mechanic, not a complete game. Judge it for > what it's worth. > > If it turns out nobody likes it, I'll abandon it. The problem, for me, > is the tone. > > Imagine showing someone a recipe for a nice and refreshing juice, to > see what they think, and they responding “but this is not a complete > meal. I'm hungry”. >
I've provided some more mechanical review from a quick glance. But you've presented this as a "proto" for a complete rule without any suggestion of tying it into other things, and given that two other such rules just passed while remaining untied to anything, I don't think asking the question is unreasonable. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
