On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:09 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 6/26/23 12:31, juan via agora-discussion wrote: > > Edward Murphy via agora-discussion [2023-06-25 13:56]: > >> Literally any explicit use case, even if it's just a suggestion in > >> comments. For Equality, would there be a wincon similar to radiance, > >> or could you spend some Equality for other perks, or what? For > >> Policies, would certain types of change to the gamestate be > >> restricted to 'via one or more listed Policies'? > > I really don't get it. What is radiance for? Winning? What is winning > > for? It's all just games. The interesting part, at least for me, is > > how the game is played. I.e., the mechanics, and how one engages with > > them. What do you think of those? > > > > Even if it does not have a goal, so what? It's a toy. You could say > > “then I'm not interested”, but that's different from “it's not > > interesting”. Besides, you could suggest something. And if you don't > > want to, you could just presume there could be an application or some > > other incentive and engage with the discussion. > > > > "Why should this be in the rules?" is a valid question. Putting > something in the rules means that everybody has to pay attention to it, > lest it change out from under them to actually do something, and that > people (like me) have rule-mandated obligations to track it. > > We have contracts for things that only people who are interested want to > pay attention to. > > -- > Janet Cobb > > Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason > > Hm, so we just need a reason for it to be in the rules. Maybe some sort of CFJ reward based thing, so there's incentive to approve a CFJ machine such as this one? I've thought about this a few times but I don't really know what to do about it, as playing with CFJs is bad juju, so incentivizing judgements one way or another is generally frowny, and creating them is frowning, and messing with assignment of them is frowny... But mostly, I find the complexity placed upon the officer and the officer alone to be excessive for this particular rule (needs a "reasonably determinable" policy of policy determining or the like.) -- 4ˢᵗ Deputy Herald and Deputy Prime Minister Uncertified Bad Idea Generator
