Edward Murphy via agora-discussion [2023-06-25 13:56]: > Literally any explicit use case, even if it's just a suggestion in > comments. For Equality, would there be a wincon similar to radiance, > or could you spend some Equality for other perks, or what? For > Policies, would certain types of change to the gamestate be > restricted to 'via one or more listed Policies'?
I really don't get it. What is radiance for? Winning? What is winning for? It's all just games. The interesting part, at least for me, is how the game is played. I.e., the mechanics, and how one engages with them. What do you think of those? Even if it does not have a goal, so what? It's a toy. You could say “then I'm not interested”, but that's different from “it's not interesting”. Besides, you could suggest something. And if you don't want to, you could just presume there could be an application or some other incentive and engage with the discussion. -- juan
