On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:13 PM Reuben Staley via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/15/20 7:09 PM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote: > >> If we're allowed to use the words "earn", "award" and "qualify", whose > >> meanings cannot be reasonably assumed, at least not in their full scope > >> (i.e. you qualify for ribbons for seven days after you earn them, > >> earning and awarding oneself are related but different despite seeming > >> similar, and even more intricacies), then we are certainly allowed to > >> use "refer" > > > > Well those terms appear in the rules > > Apparently I am an absolute idiot. I thought that "refer" itself > appeared in the rule for referring proposals. I was wondering how there > was any argument over if this CFJ but it turns out I just needed to > actually read the rules. Okay, well, if you thought it was *in the rules...* I think we can safely assume it's generic at this point. -Aris > >