On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:36 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > On 5/14/2020 12:44 PM, nch wrote: > > On Thursday, May 14, 2020 2:39:04 PM CDT Aris Merchant wrote: > >> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:18 PM Aris Merchant wrote: > >>> Definition: To refer a proposal to a chamber is to set its chamber > >>> switch to that chamber. > >> > >> I CFJ "In a generic Agoran context, to refer a proposal to a chamber > >> is to set its chamber switch to that chamber." > >> > >> Arguments: > >> > >> I've been putting "Definition: To refer a proposal to a chamber is to > >> set its chamber switch to that chamber." at the top of my referral > >> messages since February. My hope is that people have seen it enough by > >> now that the average Agoran knows what it means without needing to see > >> the definition. > >> > >> -Aris > > > > I think this instance is probably fine but I have some concern about > building > > up jargon that isn't codified somehow. Could easily be a rule addition > to define > > it. > > > > I tried to lay out a 3-part test for accepting jargon in CFJ 3663 (one of > the ones missing from the database): > > > https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2018-September/039201.html > > A quick re-read of that judgement and I'd guess "refer" has as strong a > case as any for being acceptable (but I'll assign it to a different judge > than me, I'm curious how 3663 holds up to additional scrutiny...) > > -G. > > I'm not able to log into that list (I don't remember my password and every time I try to reset my password, it simply doesn't work). If it's not too much trouble, could you link that judgement in another form when you distribute this CFJ (at least if you give it to me) -- >From R. Lee
