G. wrote:
Really, the past is a bit of a red herring and shouldn't come into it (unless it was the immediate past and in most players' memory). The "Notice of Honour" label and form factor, the +1 and -1 and reasons for the chosen people, and a k-word of similar sound/length to the correct word that has no meaning in the current ruleset. And Notices don't have any heightened clarity requirements beyond "specify". I mean, if AGAINT is a vote, then that Notice should have worked.
For the record, I only 'vote' AGAINT when I care more about referencing that old case than I do about what vote (if any) is officially recorded.
