Quorum might be wrong, given this CoE on the Assessor report by G (in a
reply to the thread):
CoE: This leaves out my votes on Telnaior's behalf, which change the
outcome of at least one proposal I think (8184).
Also, what exactly is your "standard reward policy"?
Jason Cobb
On 6/22/19 9:41 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Here's a draft of my Promotor report. My standard reward policy for
catching errors is in effect.
-Aris
---
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
quorum is 7, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid
options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are
conditional votes).
ID Author(s) AI Title
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8188 G. 3.0 Blanket Denial
8189 Jason Cobb 1.7 Rule 2479 Cleanup (v1.2)
8190 G., D Margaux 2.0 Report Rewards
8191 R. Lee 1.1 Spaceships
8192 G. 1.0 auctions have fees
The proposal pool is currently empty.
The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8188
Title: Blanket Denial
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: G.
Co-authors:
Amend Rule 2201 (Self-Ratification) by replacing:
do one of the following in a timely fashion:
with
do one of the following in a timely fashion, in an announcement
that clearly cites the claim of error:
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8189
Title: Rule 2479 Cleanup (v1.2)
Adoption index: 1.7
Author: Jason Cobb
Co-authors:
Amend Rule 2479 ("Official Justice") as follows:
Replace the text
The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose
Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game by levying a fine
of up to 2 blots on em. Summary Judgement is imposed on the
Referee's own initiative, and not in response to any official
proceeding.
with the text
Subject to the provisions of this rule, the Referee CAN, by announcement,
impose Summary Judgment on a player. When e does so, e levies a fine of
up to 2 Blots on em. If e does not specify the number of Blots in the fine,
the attempt to impose Summary Judgment is INEFFECTIVE. Summary Judgement is
imposed on the Referee's own initiative, and not in response to any official
proceeding.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8190
Title: Report Rewards
Adoption index: 2.0
Author: G.
Co-authors: D Margaux
Amend Rule 1006 (Offices) by prepending the following text to the 1st
paragraph:
An Office is a position described as an Office by the Rules.
Amend Rule 2496 (Rewards) by replacing:
* Publishing a duty-fulfilling report: 5 coins. For each office,
this reward can only be claimed for the first weekly report
published in a week and the first monthly report published in a
month.
with:
* Publishing an office's weekly or monthly report, provided that
publication was the first report published for that office in
the relevant time period (week or month respectively) to fulfill
an official weekly or monthly duty: 5 coins.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8191
Title: Spaceships
Adoption index: 1.1
Author: R. Lee
Co-authors:
Create a spaceship in the possession of each player without a
spaceship
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8192
Title: auctions have fees
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: G.
Co-authors:
[The payment rule for auctions just says that if you happen to have an
auction debt, if you pay Agora under any circumstances, it triggers
stuff. This means, if someone happens to have two auction debts, they
can make one payment and it would count for both. This brings things
into line.]
Amend Rule 2551 (Auction End) by replacing:
The winner of a lot SHALL pay the Auctioneer the number of the
Auction's currency equal to eir bid, in a single payment, in a
timely fashion.
with:
The winner of the lot SHALL, in a timely fashion, pay a fee (the
number of the Auction's currency equal to eir bid) to the
Auctioneer in order to satisfy eir auction debt.
[This makes "satisfying eir auction debt" a fee-based action governed
under R2579, which didn't exist when the auction rules were written.
R2579 then takes care of the various CANs and method details. The
transfer of the lots is then a consequence of "satisfying eir auction
debt"].
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
