Here's my weekly draft. D Margaux, you can stop worrying about
deputizing for me now...
-Aris
---
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
quorum is 3, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid
options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are
conditional votes).
ID Author(s) AI Title
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8152 G. 2.0 Justice Reenactment
8153 D Margaux 1.0 Favour Loophole Closure
8154 CuddleBeam 1.0 [Seductive yodeling noises]
8155 twg, Telnaior 1.0 Spaaace Loophole #493
8156 Trigon 3.0 version ∞
8157 Trigon 1.0 No one likes a (space) bully
8158 D Margaux, G. 3.0 The Duumvirate v.1.2
8159 G. 3.0 Temporary Deputies
8160 D Margaux 1.0 Justice Favour Adjustments
The proposal pool is currently empty.
The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8152
Title: Justice Reenactment
Adoption index: 2.0
Author: G.
Co-authors:
Re-enact Rule 2246 (name at repeal: Submitting a CFJ to the Justiciar),
at Power-2, and the following text:
When a person initiates a Call for Judgement, e CAN, optionally,
submit it to the Referee by announcement. All persons are
ENCOURAGED to submit a case to the Referee only when there is a
good reason not to let it be processed by the Arbitor as usual.
When a CFJ is submitted to the Referee, the Referee receives all
obligations and powers for the specific case that the Arbitor
would otherwise receive due to being Arbitor. This takes
precedence over Rules that would otherwise assign duties and
powers regarding a judicial case to the Arbitor.
Retitle Rule 2246 to "Submitting a CFJ to the Referee".
[
History of R2246:
Created by Proposal 6181 (comex), 7 April 2009
Amended(1) by Proposal 6333 (coppro), 29 May 2009
Amended(2) by Proposal 6496 (coppro), 26 September 2009
Amended(3) by Proposal 6662 (Murphy; disi.), 10 March 2010
Amended(4) by Proposal 6752 (Murphy), 2 August 2010
Amended(5) by Proposal 6891 (coppro), 20 November 2010
Repealed by Proposal 6961 '52-pickup v2' (G.), 3 March 2011
]
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8153
Title: Favour Loophole Closure
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: D Margaux
Co-authors:
Amend Rule 2542 to replace:
“The following officers CAN by announcement award Favours in the listed
Parties, but SHALL NOT do so except as required by rule.”
With:
“The following officers CAN by announcement award Favours in the listed
Parties only to the extent required by rule.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8154
Title: [Seductive yodeling noises]
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: CuddleBeam
Co-authors:
Change "Any player whose Fame is either 10 or -10 CAN win the game With 2 Days
Notice." to "Any player whose Fame is either 10 or -10 CAN Become One With
The Cosmos With 2 Days Notice
When a player Becomes One With The Cosmos, if their Fame is either 10 or
-10, their Fame is set to 0 and they win the game."
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8155
Title: Spaaace Loophole #493
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: twg
Co-authors: Telnaior
Amend Rule 2591, "Spaceships", by changing the text "Armour (an
integer switch limited to values from 0 to 10 inclusive)" to "Armour
(an integer switch limited to values less than or equal to 10)" and
by changing the text 'A Spaceship with an Armour of 0 is "Defeated"'
to 'A Spaceship with an Armour of 0 or less is "Defeated"'.
[There are other ways to patch this, but I feel this is more elegant.
If anybody else prefers a different solution, feel free to propose
it.]
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8156
Title: version ∞
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Trigon
Co-authors:
Amend Rule 2350 (Power=3) 'Proposals' by adding an item to the bulleted
list:
* A version, which SHOULD only be used when a proposal has been
retracted and another proposal has been created with a similar
purpose.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8157
Title: No one likes a (space) bully
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Trigon
Co-authors:
Amend the paragraph beginning "A Space Battle CANNOT be initiated" in
Rule 2593 (Power=1) 'Space Battles' by removing the final period and
adding the following: "or if the prior Space Battle the spaceship
initiating the Space Battle has been in was against the spaceship it is
attacking."
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8158
Title: The Duumvirate v.1.2
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: D Margaux
Co-authors: G.
Enact a power 3 rule entitled "The Duumvirate" with the following text:
{
The Duumvirate is an organization whose members are D. Margaux and G.
Each member of the Duumvirate is a "Dictator."
Either Dictator CAN by announcement cause this Rule to repeal itself.
No person can act on behalf of a Dictator (other than the Dictator acting as
emself).
A Decree is a document clearly labeled as such. Either Dictator CAN proclaim a
Decree with support from the other Dictator.
When a Decree is proclaimed, then:
(1) its power is set to 3;
(2) it takes effect by applying to the gamestate the changes specified
in the text of the Decree, to the greatest extent permitted by the
rules; and then,
(3) its power is set to 0.
}
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8159
Title: Temporary Deputies
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: G.
Co-authors:
Amend Rule 2160 (Deputisation) by replacing:
5. the deputy, when performing the action, announces that e is
doing so by deputisation.
with:
5. the deputy, when performing the action, announces that e is
doing so by deputisation or by temporary deputisation.
and by replacing:
When a player deputises for an elected office, e becomes the
holder of that office, unless the action being performed would
already install someone into that office.
with:
When a player deputises for an elected office, e becomes the
holder of that office, unless the action being performed would
already install someone into that office, and/or unless the
deputisation is temporary.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8160
Title: Justice Favour Adjustments
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: D Margaux
Co-authors:
[[Comment: This proposal fixes a mistaken reference to “cards,” requires the
Referee to act in a timely fashion, and increases the reward to encourage a
little more finger pointing, which I find to be an entertaining part of the
game.]]
Amend Rule 2542 to replace:
{When a player's Finger-Pointing leads to a Card award, or when the Referee
issues Summary Judgement, the Referee shall award a Favour in the Party
holding Justice to the responsible player.}
With:
{When a player's Finger-Pointing results in a player being fined one or more
blots, or when the Referee issues Summary Judgement, the Referee SHALL in a
timely fashion award 2 Favours in the Party holding Justice to the responsible
player.}
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
