Looks correct to me, but note that I just submitted another proposal. -twg
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Friday, November 23, 2018 8:40 AM, Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Okay, everyone, I am not technically late for a change, so here's a > draft of my Promotor report. Corrections are, as always, appreciated. > > -Aris > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the > quorum is 6, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid > options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are > conditional votes). > > ID Author(s) AI Title > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > 8133 Trigon 1.0 Proposals aren't worth that much > 8134 G. 2.0 The judge switch > 8135 twg, D Margaux 2.0 Blot Decay (Reprise) > 8136 V.J. Rada 3.0 I hate myself > > The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8133 > Title: Proposals aren't worth that much > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Trigon > Co-authors: > > Amend rule 2496 by replacing the text "the total strength of all valid > ballots", wherever it appears, to "the number of valid ballots". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8134 > Title: The judge switch > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: G. > Co-authors: > > Amend R991 (Calls for Judgement) by replacing the paragraph beginning > "When a CFJ has no judge assigned" with the following text: > > Judge is an untracked CFJ switch with possible values of any > person or "unassigned" (default). To "assign" a CFJ to a person > is to flip that CFJ's judge to that person. To "remove" or > "recuse" a person from a being the judge of a CFJ is to flip that > CFJ's judge from that person to unassigned. > > When a CFJ's judge is unassigned, the Arbitor CAN assign any > eligible player to be its judge by announcement, and SHALL do so > in a timely fashion. The players eligible to be assigned as judge > are all active players except the initiator and the person barred > (if any). The Arbitor SHALL assign judges over time such that all > interested players have reasonably equal opportunities to judge. > If a CFJ has no judge assigned, then any player eligible to judge > that CFJ CAN assign it to emself Without 3 Objections. > > [I think all instances of judge assignment/removal work with the > above definitions, without further modification]. > > For every CFJ that was assigned to a judge immediately before this > proposal took effect, that CFJ's judge switch is flipped to that > judge. > > [Note: all old cases - however old - are still considered to have > their last-assigned judge (judges are not "removed" when a case is > closed). This is true both before and after this proposal]. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8135 > Title: Blot Decay (Reprise) > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: twg > Co-authors: D Margaux > > Amend Rule 2555 to replace: > > “If a player has neither gained blots nor expunged any blots from emself > in the current Agoran week, e CAN expunge 1 blot from emself by > announcement.” > > With: > > “At the end of each Agoran week, 1 blot is automatically expunged from each > impure player who that week had not gained any blots.” > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8136 > Title: I hate myself > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: V.J. Rada > Co-authors: > > Rules or Instruments to the contrary notwithstanding, this proposal > shall act as though its text is the text submitted to a public forum and > clearly marked "Memes submission" by the last person to vote FOR it. > > //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
