On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Aris Merchant
<thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's my draft of a fix to the spending definition. It defines
> spending as being whichever of transferring or destroying is needed to
> do an action, with a somewhat convoluted fallback (designed to attempt
> to capture intent) if the enabling entity just said spending. Since
> there's no point having two definitions of spending, and since I've
> never been comfortable with having action points just be a floating
> thing, this makes them a fixed destructible currency. People are
> welcome to make them liquid in a future proposal if they want to, but
> for now I'm keeping existing behavior.
>
> Note that I think I'm almost done with my contracts proposal. I have
> more time than usual this weekend, so I will hopefully be able to
> respond to any objections quickly enough to get it in to this week's
> distribution. I'm going to put this proposal in as a redundant copy in
> case the main contracts proposal fails or is delayed for some reason.
>
> -Aris
> ---
> Title: Spending Fix
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-authors: G.
>
> Amend Rule 2166, "Assets", by inserting the paragraph
>
>   "To spend an asset is to pay or destroy it for the purpose of doing some 
> other
>   action or fulfilling an obligation; if the action would not be completed, 
> the
>   obligation would not be at least partially fulfilled, or more of the asset
>   would be spent than is needed to perform the action/fulfill the obligation,
>   then the attempt to spend fails. Whether the asset must be spent or payed
>   is determined by what is needed to perform the action. If the entity 
> defining
>   or enabling the action oes not specify which is necessary, but merely that
>   the asset must be spent, then the asset is destroyed if it is destructible 
> and
>   payed (to Agora unless otherwise specified) if it is indestructible."
>
> after the paragraph beginning "An asset generally CAN be transferred..."
>
> Amend Rule 2500, "Action Points", by changing it to read in full:
>
>   Action Points (AP) are a fixed destructible untracked currency. At the
>   beginning of each Agoran Week, a number of Action Points is created in the
>   possession of each player such that e has 2 Action Points. It is IMPOSSIBLE
>   for Action Points to be gained in any other way.

Typo "oes" should be "does".

-Aris

Reply via email to