On Thu, 24 Aug 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Yes, it's easy to find the archive but it's hellish to use. For example,
> here: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3289 , there's a
> reference to R105 and explains some
> important parts about that version of it.
> Imagine now that I raise a CFJ that involves R105. How am I going to find
> that reference to R105 hidden in 3289?
I completely agree. We should put a clause back in the rules governing CFJ
annotations.
It used to read like the below. The annotations in the FLR are now
"unofficial" and as
a result aren't happening.
omd also used to maintain a rules-browser with old versions of the rules. E
recently
talked about updating it, when that happens I was hoping to spend some time
cross-linking.
Gaelan also talked about cross-linking with current rules. And search would be
very nice,
it's on my list.
Rule 789/5 (Power=1)
Orders to Annotate Rules
The Judge of any CFJ, the Statement of which alleges that a Rule
should be interpreted in a certain way, which is judged TRUE,
may, at eir discretion, issue an Order requiring the Rulekeepor
to annotate the Rule in question with the Statement of that CFJ.
Such an annotation, while it exists, shall guide application of
that Rule.
[deleted some stuff about getting rid of old annotations if the
rule is changed].
