> On Aug 23, 2017, at 11:37 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> like playing I Want To Be The Guy

Steady on!

Actually, I broadly agree with your overall thesis. Precedent and history are 
_important_, and I think it’s worth understanding why things are the way they 
are before tearing them down or rebuilding them another way - but the way 
things are is fairly knob-heavy, and I cannot in the slightest blame K for 
deregistering out of concern for comprehension.

My personal coping strategy has been to ignore the mechanics that don’t 
immediately interest me, more or less, and to focus intently on the ones that 
do. However, that’s a coping strategy, not a solution: I’m surely missing 
interesting opportunities by mostly-disregarding ribbons and patent titles, or 
by not trying terribly hard to win.

As a sketch, I’d like to draft two broad proposals:

# Repeal the Referee

* Convert SHALL NOT et al into something equivalent to CANNOT or IMPOSSIBLE
* Modify SHALLs to allow any player to fulfil them if the obliged party does 
not do so
* Destroy the office of Referee entirely, as well as the associated card rules

We can always reinvent it, but punishment is probably the wrong paradigm for 
Agora as it is today, on the whole. A much more narrowly-scoped punishment 
system for dealing with specific malfeasance might be a practical replacement, 
and clearing the ground will make it easier to re-draft.

# Repeal Organizations

They’re moribund, really. No organization presently has more than one active 
member.

-o

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to