I'll have more detailed thoughts later, but overall I'm concerned about Support slowing things down and creating more uncertainty (players having to check if something has received enough Support). In my version, I tried to make the decisions as self-contained as possible so we're not waiting for responses and double-checking conditions being met.
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: > I think the AP stuff was economically problematic as given as there'd > very rarely be a need to spend shinies. How often does a typical player > do three proposals/CFJs in a week? The answer is "not often", and all > those players would just hoard Shinies as they have no reason to spend > them. > > Note that AP-actions don't pay out. You can hoard your shinies and use AP instead, but you'd make more shinies if you effectively used them for proposals. Honestly I would do an AP of 1 if I thought it wouldn't be opposed, but people have already asked for 5.
