What about an analogous pending system for CFJs? Anyone can submit but they only get assigned to a judge after someone has paid the fee. The fee should be low and stable. The judge gets paid the fee upon judgment. Even 2 shinies is probably enough to slow tge pace down without stopping it, and because other people can 'pend' your CFJ it doesn't completely lock out new players.
On May 30, 2017 16:28, "Kerim Aydin" <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Tue, 30 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > I don't know if this was clear, but the intent of the proposal was > > to avoid people getting "stuck" with CFJs they don't wish to judge. > > Under this proposal, the only people bothered by a frivolous CFJ > > are ais523 and anyone interested in judging (assuming others don't > > mind skipping over the DIS messages). It's not perfect- -far from it- > > -but it's better than nothing. > > It wasn't clear. But being stuck with a CFJ you don't want is part of the > job and random draw of being a judge, helping to clear the load. (we > should definitely have judicial compensation/salaries though). > > > Another idea: make CFJs with no effect on the current gamestate a > > dependent action of some sort. > > "CFJ: this cfj has an effect on the current gamestate." > > > >
