On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 6:17 PM Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
> On May 29, 2017, at 6:04 PM, Aris Merchant < > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Missing a close parenthesis. Why do we need None? Surely any player > could occasionally want to judge a case, so the distinction seems > unnecessary. > > Fair. > > I'd also make Wide the default, although that is open to > debate. The judicial system is a good way to get new players involved. > > That’s a departure from the current system (not necessarily bad). However, > I’m still against it—I feel that judging should be a decision a player > makes when they feel they understand enough of the ruleset to jump in, and > faulty judgements from new players help nobody. > None should be the default - A new player shouldn't be hit with judging a CFJ immediately - Judicial duties should be opt in.
