I retract “Judicial Reform.”
I create the AI-2 proposal “Judicial Reform v2” by Gaelan, Aris and Quazie with
the following text: <
Amend R991 “Calls for Judgement” by replacing the last paragraph with {
“Judge Status” is a player switch tracked by the Arbitor in eir monthly report,
with valid values of “Narrow” (default) and “Wide.” A player may flip eir own
Judge Status by announcement.When a CFJ has no judge assigned, the Arbitor CAN assign any player to be its judge by announcement, and SHALL do so within a week, but CANNOT do so if fewer than 2 days have passed since the CFJ was initiated. The players eligible to be assigned as judge are players except the initiator and the person barred (if any) who fulfill one of these requirements: 1. Eir Judge Status is set to Narrow, and they have publicly declared Interest in the CFJ. 2. Eir Judge Status is set to Wide, and they have not publicly declared Disinterest in the CFJ. The Arbitor SHALL assign judges over time such that all interested players have reasonably equal opportunities to judge. If a CFJ has no judge assigned, then any player eligible to judge that CFJ CAN assign it to emself Without 3 Objections. If there are no eligible judges for a CFJ for a period of 2 weeks, any player CAN judge it as DISMISS with 2 days Notice. } For all players who have been assigned a CFJ within the past 2 weeks, flip their Judge Status to Wide. > Gaelan > On May 29, 2017, at 6:25 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 6:17 PM Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com > <mailto:g...@canishe.com>> wrote: >> On May 29, 2017, at 6:04 PM, Aris Merchant >> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com >> <mailto:thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Missing a close parenthesis. Why do we need None? Surely any player >> could occasionally want to judge a case, so the distinction seems >> unnecessary. > > Fair. > >> I'd also make Wide the default, although that is open to >> debate. The judicial system is a good way to get new players involved. > > That’s a departure from the current system (not necessarily bad). However, > I’m still against it—I feel that judging should be a decision a player makes > when they feel they understand enough of the ruleset to jump in, and faulty > judgements from new players help nobody. > > None should be the default - A new player shouldn't be hit with judging a CFJ > immediately - Judicial duties should be opt in.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
