On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
> I create the AI-2 proposal “Judicial Reform” by Gaelan with the following
> text: <
>
> Amend R991 “Calls for Judgement” by replacing the last paragraph with {
>
> “Judge Status” is a player switch tracked by the Arbitor in eir monthly
> report, with valid values of “None” (default, “Narrow,” and “Wide.” A player
> may flip eir own Judge Status by announcement.Missing a close parenthesis. Why do we need None? Surely any player could occasionally want to judge a case, so the distinction seems unnecessary. I'd also make Wide the default, although that is open to debate. The judicial system is a good way to get new players involved. -Aris
