I like this, but I think also adding procedural DISMISSALS without objection
would be a helpful addition.
----
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On May 30, 2017, at 2:41 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
>
> Bah.
>
> I retract “Judicial Reform.”
>
> I create the AI-2 proposal “Judicial Reform v2” by Gaelan, Aris and Quazie
> with the following text: <
> Amend R991 “Calls for Judgement” by replacing the last paragraph with {
> “Judge Status” is a player switch tracked by the Arbitor in eir monthly
> report, with valid values of “Narrow” (default) and “Wide.” A player may flip
> eir own Judge Status by announcement.
>
> When a CFJ has no judge assigned, the Arbitor CAN assign any player to be its
> judge by announcement, and SHALL do so within a week, but CANNOT do so if
> fewer than 2 days have passed since the CFJ was initiated. The players
> eligible to be assigned as judge are players except the initiator and the
> person barred (if any) who fulfill one of these requirements:
> 1. Eir Judge Status is set to Narrow, and they have publicly declared
> Interest in the CFJ.
> 2. Eir Judge Status is set to Wide, and they have not publicly declared
> Disinterest in the CFJ.
> The Arbitor SHALL assign judges over time such that all interested players
> have reasonably equal opportunities to judge. If a CFJ has no judge assigned,
> then any player eligible to judge that CFJ CAN assign it to emself Without 3
> Objections.
>
> If there are no eligible judges for a CFJ for a period of 2 weeks, any player
> CAN judge it as DISMISS with 2 days Notice.
> }
>
> For all players who have been assigned a CFJ within the past 2 weeks, flip
> their Judge Status to Wide.
> >
>
> Gaelan
>
>> On May 29, 2017, at 11:39 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
>>
>> I retract “Judicial Reform.”
>>
>> I create the AI-2 proposal “Judicial Reform v2” by Gaelan, Aris and Quazie
>> with the following text: <
>> Amend R991 “Calls for Judgement” by replacing the last paragraph with {
>> “Judge Status” is a player switch tracked by the Arbitor in eir monthly
>> report, with valid values of “Narrow” (default) and “Wide.” A player may
>> flip eir own Judge Status by announcement.
>>
>> When a CFJ has no judge assigned, the Arbitor CAN assign any player to be
>> its judge by announcement, and SHALL do so within a week, but CANNOT do so
>> if fewer than 2 days have passed since the CFJ was initiated. The players
>> eligible to be assigned as judge are players except the initiator and the
>> person barred (if any) who fulfill one of these requirements:
>> 1. Eir Judge Status is set to Narrow, and they have publicly declared
>> Interest in the CFJ.
>> 2. Eir Judge Status is set to Wide, and they have not publicly declared
>> Disinterest in the CFJ.
>> The Arbitor SHALL assign judges over time such that all interested players
>> have reasonably equal opportunities to judge. If a CFJ has no judge
>> assigned, then any player eligible to judge that CFJ CAN assign it to emself
>> Without 3 Objections.
>>
>> If there are no eligible judges for a CFJ for a period of 2 weeks, any
>> player CAN judge it as DISMISS with 2 days Notice.
>> }
>>
>> For all players who have been assigned a CFJ within the past 2 weeks, flip
>> their Judge Status to Wide.
>> >
>>
>> Gaelan
>>
>>> On May 29, 2017, at 6:25 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 6:17 PM Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
>>>> On May 29, 2017, at 6:04 PM, Aris Merchant
>>>> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Missing a close parenthesis. Why do we need None? Surely any player
>>>> could occasionally want to judge a case, so the distinction seems
>>>> unnecessary.
>>> Fair.
>>>
>>>> I'd also make Wide the default, although that is open to
>>>> debate. The judicial system is a good way to get new players involved.
>>> That’s a departure from the current system (not necessarily bad). However,
>>> I’m still against it—I feel that judging should be a decision a player
>>> makes when they feel they understand enough of the ruleset to jump in, and
>>> faulty judgements from new players help nobody.
>>>
>>> None should be the default - A new player shouldn't be hit with judging a
>>> CFJ immediately - Judicial duties should be opt in.
>>
>
