On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, nichdel wrote:
> I also think this provides a much-needed structure to the rules. Sure the
> rulekeepor imposes an order as they see fit, but rules aren't written with any
> particular organizational style in mind.
On a side note, I'm thinking of a short "reorganize the rules" contest for
current rules. (E.g. re-order the main index, introduce categories, rulekeepor
will adopt most preferred). Sub-sub categories allowed.
>From my attempts though, nichdel is right-on; substantial within-rule reorg
is needed too.
