On Sat, 2011-04-23 at 20:23 -0400, omd wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Eric Stucky <turiski.no...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Gratuitous: Ratifications, by definition in 1551, make minimal > possible changes to the game state. In particular it "cannot include a > rule change unless the ratified document purports to include the text, > title, and/or power of the rule being changed." Repealing a rule is a > rule change, by definition. No SLR or FLR published (to my knowledge) > has done this. So if ehird was a rule before, e is still a rule. > > Gratuitous silliness: If ehird is a rule, then thanks to Rule 105, e > has not changed since 2007 in any way that affects eir operation. > Luckily, eir mother narrowly escaped violating the rules by creating > em, because rules were not explicitly defined at the time.
Gratuitous: Agora is actually older than ehird is. However, I don't think anything in the ruleset at the moment ehird was born would be likely to imply e was a rule. (I don't think anything in the current ruleset does either.) -- ais523
