On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 4:31 PM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: > Most of these "restrictions" are intended to explicitly empower rules > to do things, not to restrict what might be a rule.
(And yes, this is a chicken and egg scenario.)
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 4:31 PM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: > Most of these "restrictions" are intended to explicitly empower rules > to do things, not to restrict what might be a rule.
(And yes, this is a chicken and egg scenario.)