On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Eric Stucky <turiski.no...@gmail.com> wrote: > Gratuitous: Ratifications, by definition in 1551, make minimal possible > changes to the game state. In particular it "cannot include a rule change > unless the ratified document purports to include the text, title, and/or > power of the rule being changed." Repealing a rule is a rule change, by > definition. No SLR or FLR published (to my knowledge) has done this. So if > ehird was a rule before, e is still a rule.
Gratuitous silliness: If ehird is a rule, then thanks to Rule 105, e has not changed since 2007 in any way that affects eir operation. Luckily, eir mother narrowly escaped violating the rules by creating em, because rules were not explicitly defined at the time.
