omd wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >>>> Since the current policy adds unnecessary complexity, amend Rule 2280 >>>> (Implicit Votes) by replacing "a number of ballots equal to eir voting >>>> limit on that decision" with "one hundred ballots". >> >> Oh, right. >> >> Proposal: Â Implicit Excess >> (AI = 3, II = 1, co-author = omd, distributable via fee) >> >> Amend Rule 2280 (Implicit Votes) by replacing "a number of ballots >> equal to eir voting limit on that decision" with "14 ballots". > > > 14? I would understand 12, but...
http://wiki.cepheid.org/index.php/14
