omd wrote: > On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >>>> Amend Rule 2156 (Voting on Ordinary Decisions) by replacing "resolution" >>>> with "end of the voting period". >> >> No, it takes away precisely that power. Â The advantage to the Assessor >> is that it eases bookkeeping (once the Herald reports the state of the >> list as of the end of a decision's voting period, the Assessor can >> resolve that decision without worrying about subsequent changes). Â If >> the Herald reports in something approaching a timely fashion, anyway. > > One of the great things of being deregistered is not being an eligible > voter, but I'll say that I'm strongly AGAINST. > Post-end-of-voting-period voting limit manipulations are fun.
Oh, sure, try being Assessor (for more than one message) and then come back and say that with a straight face.
