On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> Why not propose my not-proposal of a week ago? > > Which one was that?
This: > Since the current policy adds unnecessary complexity, amend Rule 2280 > (Implicit Votes) by replacing "a number of ballots equal to eir voting > limit on that decision" with "one hundred ballots".
