Wooble wrote: > On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> Proposal: Moving targets are hard >> (AI = 2, II = 1, distributable via fee) >> >> Amend Rule 2156 (Voting on Ordinary Decisions) by replacing "resolution" >> with "end of the voting period". > > against; gives the Assessor way too much power. although I believe > you asserted this power in a recent resolution anyway.
No, it takes away precisely that power. The advantage to the Assessor is that it eases bookkeeping (once the Herald reports the state of the list as of the end of a decision's voting period, the Assessor can resolve that decision without worrying about subsequent changes). If the Herald reports in something approaching a timely fashion, anyway.
