On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >>> Amend Rule 2156 (Voting on Ordinary Decisions) by replacing "resolution" >>> with "end of the voting period". > > No, it takes away precisely that power. The advantage to the Assessor > is that it eases bookkeeping (once the Herald reports the state of the > list as of the end of a decision's voting period, the Assessor can > resolve that decision without worrying about subsequent changes). If > the Herald reports in something approaching a timely fashion, anyway.
One of the great things of being deregistered is not being an eligible voter, but I'll say that I'm strongly AGAINST. Post-end-of-voting-period voting limit manipulations are fun.
