On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:31 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > (Somewhat related: I don't like the kind of scam that just consists of > pedantically misinterpreting rules, but such scams are often laughed out of > the *Agoran* courts. But I distinguish between that kind and the kind that > merely takes advantage of weird or unintuitive definitions in the rules, or > unexpected interactions between rules (still at a low enough level that it > might be laughed out of a real court), such as the > act-on-behalf-of-Monster-rule one (which I'm partial to even though it > failed), or, heck, the "pocket veto" in the U.S. Constitution. That is my > favorite kind of scam.)
Proto: Award the Patent Title "Scamster" to James Madison.
