On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 14:52 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, omd wrote: > > On the other hand, submitting a proposal with an intentional loophole > > is bordering on dishonesty and violation of trust, and, indeed, can be > > illegal unless the title is sufficiently vague and the proposal isn't > > Disinterested. > > I disagree vehemently with this sentiment; I think getting a loophole > through is the fundamental gameplay of a Nomic, and Agora is a Nomic.
As do I. No matter what else we put in the game, proposals are likely always going to be at the core, always there waiting for someone to slip a loophole in or do something interesting with them. Arguably, it's a breach of trust to submit a loopholey proposal in in a situation where you've indicated you won't do that; but I don't make such assurances, precisely because it would close off an interesting part of the game to me. -- ais523
