G. wrote: > On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, omd wrote: >> Thus, if Murphy submits a >> proposal to refactor such-and-such, usually I will just vote FOR it, >> assuming that it does indeed refactor something in a sensible way, > > True ancient history: Murphy used this reputation to slip something > into a refactor that was a critical ingredient in the Town Fountain. > (replacing a "greater than" with an "equal or greater than" in the > midst of the larger refactor, IIRC).
Was that VI >= AI? IIRC I wanted to make that change on its own merits, if it helped the Fountain then that was just gravy. (Also IIRC I legitimately failed to foresee that it wouldn't feel right when VI = AI = 1.)
