On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Ed Murphy wrote: > G. wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, omd wrote: > >> Thus, if Murphy submits a > >> proposal to refactor such-and-such, usually I will just vote FOR it, > >> assuming that it does indeed refactor something in a sensible way, > > > > True ancient history: Murphy used this reputation to slip something > > into a refactor that was a critical ingredient in the Town Fountain. > > (replacing a "greater than" with an "equal or greater than" in the > > midst of the larger refactor, IIRC). > > Was that VI >= AI? IIRC I wanted to make that change on its own > merits, if it helped the Fountain then that was just gravy. (Also > IIRC I legitimately failed to foresee that it wouldn't feel right > when VI = AI = 1.)
That's the one. I misremembered that you came up with the idea for the scam but then justified it to the public as something worth its own merits. -G.
