On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:40, Kerim Aydin<ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote: >> Would your opinion of this proposal change if criminal penalty for >> exceeding your hand limit were changed to a monthly offense (instead >> of weekly), perhaps with an increased penalty? > > My suggestion would just be to apply a Rest directly without invoking > all of NoVs and courts etc. By the way, I thought through all these > options carefully when I wrote the Cards proposal - it was the single > hardest thing to resolve in the writing - but came to the different > preferred option based on experience from cards last time.
That's a possibility. For those of us who weren't around last time, how did hand limits used to be enforced? > > But here's an idea. To divorce it from the suggestion of criminality > altogether, you could make the marker a "bad" card that would be created > in hoarders' hands [the following needs cleaning]: > I was thinking along similar lines (see my Court Jester proposal) though I'm not certain it's the most elegant solution for enforcing hand limits. For starters, cards have no way to provide a static, ongoing effect - only an exploit that is invoked when it is played. Therefore your Millstone couldn't prevent transfers or card plays without a significant re-write of the definition of cards. BobTHJ
