On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 14:08, comex<com...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Taral<tar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Roger Hicks<pidge...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I intend (with 2 support) to appeal. A request to set a rule AI to 2 >>>> seems fairly unambiguous to me as a request to set power to 2. >>> >>> I support. More common sense please. >> >> Rule 217 only goes so far when "common sense" directly contradicts the >> text of the Rules. > > In order for their to be ambiguity an informed Agoran player would > have to reasonably believe that AI-2 meant something other than > power=2 in that situation. I just don't see it - it was pretty clear > to everyone what G. intended.
I agree with c. here; rule changes have a special standard and absolute and precise specification is required. I screwed up. -G.
