On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 14:48 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 14:46, Sean Hunt<ride...@gmail.com> wrote: > > AI is a term defined and used in many places in the rules. There is no > > qway to say that setting a rule's AI is unambiguously setting a rule's > > power. My interpretation would be that it simply sets its AI. The > > alternative interpretation, which is that of a genuined ambiguity, means > > the Rule Changes were completely ineffective (as the /entire/ rule > > change is without effect), which would be a huge problem. > > > Except rules don't have AI. They have a Power index instead.
Who says they don't have an AI? The AI of a rule wouldn't do anything, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. (Imagine somebody submitting a rule as a proposal.) -- ais523
