On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 02:08, Sean Hunt<ride...@gmail.com> wrote: > Roger Hicks wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 01:59, Sean Hunt<ride...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Roger Hicks wrote: >>>> So....anyone want to fix this? If this judgment stands all current >>>> deals are in error since the cards and decks do not exist. >>>> >>>> BobTHJ >>> Why is that? Defining cards isn't secured as far as I see. >>> >> All the rules that define the basic decks have no power. >> >> BobTHJ > Power defaults to 1. > comex clearly believes these rules do not exist at all based on eir judgment. So which is it? If these rules exist at power=1 (preferable in my opinion) then someone else should support my appeal so more appropriate arguments can be submitted with the judgment.
BobTHJ
