On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 14:08, comex<com...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Taral<tar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Roger Hicks<pidge...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I intend (with 2 support) to appeal. A request to set a rule AI to 2 >>> seems fairly unambiguous to me as a request to set power to 2. >> >> I support. More common sense please. > > Rule 217 only goes so far when "common sense" directly contradicts the > text of the Rules.
In order for their to be ambiguity an informed Agoran player would have to reasonably believe that AI-2 meant something other than power=2 in that situation. I just don't see it - it was pretty clear to everyone what G. intended. BobTHJ
