On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Kerim Aydin<ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Paul VanKoughnett wrote: >> I join this pledge. Sorry, G. > > Actually, with all the annoying support messages it's not such a bad > temporary solution come to think of it; what I'm objecting to is the > Yally's accompanying suggestion that we should just get rid of > distributability altogether (after only a one-week trial) rather than > fixing the support method to something that works. Gee, some things > do suck in the first implementation. But I thought we were more willing > to change a bit than that! > > And yes, I know that supporting this pledge doesn't automatically mean > voting for the rollback, but the pledge was associated with the repeal. > > -G.
Hey, I voted against the distributability proposal from the beginning and after this trial I'm even more against it.
