> Actually, a proposal to do that just had its voting period end! I don't > know if it passed, I'm (obviously) hoping it did. It does have the > problems you mentioned with an objector holding it up indefinitely... > that's why the other method is "pay a note to make it distributable." > There's enough currency floating around that if someone is objecting > indefinitely, a person can pay (or if broke, ask someone else to pay). > The money barrier is enough to make sure that people read things at > least twice before paying to distribute it, maybe? -G. > > > >
Yeah, I did see that proposal. For some reason I thought it hadn't been distributed. If it passes, we should get rid of W3S in any case. People are going to use it immediately if they are objected to, and there will still be a lot of spam. -allispaul
