On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Benjamin Caplan wrote: > Kerim Aydin wrote: >> On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: >>> Any player CAN act on behalf of any party to this pledge to support an >>> intent to make a proposal Distributable. >> >> Yes, I had wondered how long it would take to ZOOP the Support into >> meaningless. Ah, present-day agora... every time I think some mob of >> idiots can't disappoint me, I am proven wrong. -G. > > I'm under the impression that distributability is essentially dead in > the water -- people may generally disagree on where to go next, but I do > think that by-announcement is at least clearly not worse than > with-3-support.
Yes, the idea that anyone would actually stop and think about something they supported... you know the word, "restraint", was something of a pipe- dream. I only left the support in because I didn't think we would jump to a sensible pay or w/o objection system ... looks like we won't. And I agree the traffic is annoying. We'll see. -Goethe
