On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Taral <tar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I support this appeal.
>> >
>> > Judge comex's arguments on 2459:
>> >
>> > NOT GUILTY, Rule 2202 assigns it to the report but Rule 2143 is what
>> > actually obligated em to publish it.
>>
>> Rule 1789 uses the language "The Registrar shall". I think that's an
>> obligation, don't you?
>>
>> --
>> Taral <tar...@gmail.com>
>> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
>>    -- Unknown
>>
>
> Also, please destroy the two rests in my possession created by the relevant
> NoV.
>

*cough cough* ahem.

Reply via email to