On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Taral <tar...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I support this appeal. > > > > Judge comex's arguments on 2459: > > > > NOT GUILTY, Rule 2202 assigns it to the report but Rule 2143 is what > > actually obligated em to publish it. > > Rule 1789 uses the language "The Registrar shall". I think that's an > obligation, don't you? > > -- > Taral <tar...@gmail.com> > "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." > -- Unknown >
Also, please destroy the two rests in my possession created by the relevant NoV.
