On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Taral <tar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> NOT GUILTY, Rule 2202 assigns it to the report but Rule 2143 is what >> actually obligated em to publish it. > > Rule 1789 uses the language "The Registrar shall". I think that's an > obligation, don't you?
In full: "The Registrar shall note the method of deregistration for that Player in subsequent Registrar Reports, as long as the Player remains deregistered." Does that create an obligation (in which case R1789 is violated), place the method of deregistration in the report (in which case R2143 is violated), or both? It's ambiguous at best.
